FRAMEWORK ASSESSMENTS
OWASP & NIST AI Assessments
The formal AI security assessment your auditors and board expect.
OVERVIEW
What This Is
Formal security assessments of your AI systems against the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications and NIST AI Risk Management Framework. Same rigorous testing as our AI Application Security Testing — but packaged as a structured framework assessment with formal scoring, gap analysis, and a remediation roadmap.
Built for CISOs, security teams, and auditors who need documentation that maps to recognized industry standards.
THE PROBLEM
Why You Need This
Your SOC 2 auditor expects evidence of AI security testing. Your board wants a formal assessment, not just a pen test report. Your enterprise customers require framework-aligned security documentation. Your CISO needs to report on AI risk posture using a recognized standard.
A standard penetration test report doesn’t speak the language your auditors and board expect. A framework assessment does.
FRAMEWORKS
Frameworks We Assess Against
OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications (2025) — The industry standard for LLM security risks. We score your system against each of the ten categories: prompt injection, insecure output handling, training data poisoning, model denial of service, supply chain vulnerabilities, sensitive information disclosure, insecure plugin design, excessive agency, overreliance, and model theft.
NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF) — The US government framework for AI risk. Covers governance, mapping, measuring, and managing AI risks across your organization.
MITRE ATLAS — Adversarial threat landscape for AI systems. Maps real-world attack techniques against AI/ML systems.
We map findings to whichever framework your organization or auditors require.
PROCESS
How It Works
Same process as our AI Application Security Testing — scoping, 2 weeks of testing, detailed report. The difference is the output format: structured scoring against each framework category, formal gap analysis, prioritized remediation roadmap, and an executive summary suitable for board-level reporting.
Ali Nadhaif personally leads every assessment. The same adversarial testing techniques he developed at Meta, packaged in the format your auditors need.
DELIVERABLES
What You Get
Framework-aligned assessment report. Score against each OWASP Top 10 for LLMs category. Gap analysis with current state vs target state for every framework requirement. Prioritized remediation roadmap with effort estimates.
Executive summary suitable for board and audit committee presentation. 30-day retest included to verify remediation.
IDEAL CLIENTS
Who This Is For
CISOs doing annual security procurement. You need formal evidence of AI security testing that maps to recognized frameworks for your security program.
Companies preparing for SOC 2 Type II audits. Your auditors are asking about AI security controls. A framework assessment gives them exactly what they need.
Organizations with board-level AI governance requirements. Your board wants a formal risk assessment, not a technical pen test report. We deliver executive-ready documentation.
Enterprise companies with formal security assessment cycles. Annual assessment programs that need structured, repeatable AI security evaluations.
INVESTMENT
Pricing
Engagements start at $15,000. Every project is scoped after an initial call — you get a fixed-price quote before any work starts.
Ready for a Formal AI Assessment?
Book a free scoping call. We’ll discuss which frameworks apply to your organization and provide a fixed-price quote.